![]() Veteran players, however, disputed this assertion in the comments, claiming that the game had grown more challenging for free-to-play players to advance because of the hefty repair expenses necessary to use their destroyed vehicles.Įven the premium members, who pay for the game and get premium cars, complained about the hefty maintenance expenses. This served as an argument in favor of the pay-for-progress system of economics. War Thunder Is Not A Sustainable F2P Gameĭespite playing the game for extended periods, 80% of War Thunder gamers reportedly had not made any purchases. In a later section of the post, Gaijin Entertainment advises players to utilize less damaging communication techniques because doing so harms the game and discourages potential new players from trying it out. It stressed the need for the game to make money to maintain itself, which led to the development of a 'free-to-download and pay-for-progression' business model. ![]() The website's post, written by Gaijin's Creative Director Kirill Yudintsev, discussed the progression and economy of free-to-play games like War Thunder. ![]() War Thunder players, frustrated with recent news from the game's official website, took action by leaving negative reviews on Steam. ![]() War Thunder Players Left Negative Reviews on Steam Gaijin Entertainment Requests To Use 'Less Destructive Ways' Continue reading to learn about the viewpoint of a Gaijin and what War Thunder users have to say about it. Players of War Thunder are dissatistied with Gaijin Entertainment's article regarding the economy and progress. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |